Customer Reviews
Another more than satisfactory purchase 
2008-06-28
Just beginning to take up photography and from the very start I am extremely thrilled with the results of this purchase and what i have learned from using it. The one regret I have is that I didn't spend the extra money and purchased the the f/2.8 but we live and learn, More than satisfeid with the delivery, the condition and the results of using this product
Absolutely gorgeous 2008-06-14
The optics on this lens are out of this world. The daytime photos I've taken with it have been excellent. The colors, sharpness, and contrast with this lens make it worth every penny. When shooting with it, I rarely have to do any post processing because the photos come out gorgeous almost every time.
Buy This Lens!!! 2008-06-09
If you're considering this lens, it means you are hoping the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras version of this lens and the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras version of this lens are unnecessary. Let me tell you, I was in the same position: I really wanted the f/2.8L IS version, but didn't know if spending the extra $1K was worth it or not. I got this lens (f/4L, non-IS) and am COMPLETELY happy with my decision! This lens is about as light as an L lens gets, and f/4 is completely acceptable for this level of zoom, I've found. I'm really glad I saved my money (and put it towards the amazing Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Ultra Wide Angle Zoom Lens).
This lens isn't as white as I thought it would be. It seems to be more of an off-white, but that doesn't bother me. This is my first L Series lens, and I'm completely hooked! Everything about it is well-made! Even the surface of the lens is easy to grip and adjust, and it comes with a lens hood, as does the 16-35mm f/2.8L, so you don't have to worry about purchasing one separately. I got a good CP filter and an ExpoDisc for the lens, and that's really all you'll need for a modern camera. I've learned that modern digital cameras don't even really see the UV wavelengths that the UV filters used to protect your shots from, so unless you want to spend money on a little bit of lens protection by buying a UV filter, don't bother.
In summary: If you're considering this lens, get it! Don't waste your money on the f/2.8L or IS versions unless you really need it and can afford it, in which case, you probably wouldn't be considering this lens! Keep in mind a couple things: The other versions of this lens will be heavier and larger, so will be more difficult to carry. Also, a 70-200mm on a 40D or Rebel will actually be 112-320mm, as most Canon digital cameras will have a 1.6 "crop factor" compared to the more expensive 5D or hyper-expensive 1Ds Mark III, which are full-frame cameras.
I am completely satisfied with this purchase and would make the same decision again! If you get this lens, you won't be unhappy!
nice lens! 2008-06-05
this is the cheapest L lens you can buy! most people say its a must have in this focal range!
Love it. 2008-06-02
I love this lens. I bought it for my Canon 20D in the end of 2004. It is a nice choice.
great lens 2008-07-24
THIS LENS ROCKS!!!!have used this lens for a couple of months now and i have been very pleased with the pictures.still learning the camera and lens but i would highly recommend this lens for someone looking to upgrade to a proffesional qualitylens,but with a more reasonable price than the f2.8L lens.the f4L lens is great.
GREAT LENS,GREAT BUY,GREAT PICTURES!!! 2008-07-21
I shoot whenever I can, I'm a old retired fellow, so I have the time.I also have, pretty much,alot of equipment, but I am really happy with my new Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM. It truely is a very good piece of equip.
I enjoy it, and I HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT!!
Exelent Lens 2008-07-20
This is a great lens, although it is a little heavy. I use to it now quite often. The clarity is wonderful, very sharp. I was torn between this lens and the Canon 70 to 300mm IS lens, but decided to go with the quality of the L lens. I use a tripod most of the time, but occasionally hand hold it. Don't really know if I made the right decision, but I am happy with the results so far.
Far Superior to the Canon EF70-300 Image Stabilized Lens For the Same Price!! 2008-07-17
I mostly shoot outdoor sports, predominantly baseball, and had my socks knocked off the first time out with the lens at a nightgame, at which there would eventually be a heavy downpour. The lens performed like a champ, even during the downpour! Unlike the EF70-300IS, the lens locked right away on the focus area, and in auto focus mode (AF), did not "hunt" for the subject to be focused on. A great buy and a lens I'd highly recommend,
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L 2008-07-06
Absolutely the best lens I have ever used bar none! Fast, quiet auto focus & great images. If you are looking for a great lens at a moderate price, this is it. Some of the reviews talk about the low light factor being a drawback because of the F/4 which is true but can somewhat be overcome by shooting a higher ISO. I highly recommend this lens. If you have twice the money the IS version might give you a better percentage of low light images that are keepers but for the money this is a fantastic lens. Use the following link to read a review of this lens.
[...]
