Customer Reviews
Excellent photo paper 
2005-07-20
I use this paper all the time for my competive photos for the Model Horse show hobby. On my HP Photosmart Printer they come out crisp, clean and perfect! I use no other paper with the occasional exception of HPs premium paper which isn't as good as this paper in thickness and durability.
Beautiful Prints 2005-07-11
I have a Canon IP3000 and had no problems using this paper. Unlike many reviewers, I am very satisfied with the quality and even the size. The size is 4x6.5, but it's a benefit really, because you don't end up touching the photo when it has finished printing. Instead of smudging the ink or leaving a fingerprint on the photo that extra room along the side or bottom helps... and can easily be cut away later. My pictures look as perfect as they did on the days they were taken and to me, that is satisfying enough to earn it 5 stars.
Really inferior on an Epson printer 
2005-05-15
I have been using Epson high gloss paper on my Epson Photo RX500 printer and have been delighted with the results. I forget, now, why I ever bought this Kodak paper but when I got around to using it just now I hated the results. As noted by other reviewers, it's 6.5 inches long, not 6 inches. And the image results are flat and washed out compared with the prints I've been getting with Epson high gloss paper. I guess I could spend the day fiddling w/settings to see if I could claw back some of the image quality I've lost by switching to a different paper but why bother? I am going to use this paper for "test prints" and go back to Epson for stuff I want to keep.
Very good paper 2005-04-04
This is great paper for photos! For those not using a Kodak printer (which are also very highly recommended), the extra length is not a problem - you just need to format your own printer, using directions from Kodak's website. The extra space allows for easier handling if you do not want finger smudges on your beautiful prints. Perforations are there so that you can tear off the excess paper.
These prints last so long, and the paper is Kodak quality, producing great pictures!
Duhh! Why print 4x6 when it is 4x6.5 
2005-02-16
This makes no sense. If the industry standard is 4x6, why did they, Kodak, cut the paper to 4x6.5 and then advertise on the carton that it is 4x6 -- yes, I see the fine print on the back side of the carton that reads "actual paper size is 4x6.5"
I still don't understand why they did this.
Now I have cut the pictures down to the correct size...what a waste of my time!!!!!!!!!!
Not really 4x6 
2007-01-14
I don't know if it's just the pack of paper I got, but these sheets of photo paper are not really 4x6. They're more like 3.5x7. This is extremely annoying when trying to print to 4x6 because it cuts off the top of the picture and then leaves white space on the end of the picture. For it to work you have to change your printer settings and even then, the quality is not that great. I wouldn't suggest this product to anyone. Try Cannon, HP or Epson paper. Much better quality!
WOW! So Beautifully Detailed and True Color!!! 2006-07-10
After reading the reviews (several negative), I wasn't sure if I should purchase this for my Canon i9900. I am sure glad I purchased this! I bought this because my Canon paper fades so quickly that I was sick of reprinting pictures to keep the colors vibrant.
I printed about thirty pictures of my previous vacation and was so amazed. The color is wonderful, the detail is so much better than on Canon paper, and they all printed up without one bad picture (ie,smears-ink blobs-etc).
I am definitely buying more being an obsessive picture taker.
A definite must for those who take an obscene amount of pictures!!!
Noticeably worse than canon paper with my MP500 2006-05-20
I just got a Canon MP500 and bought some of this paper because it was clearance priced and I assumed it would be good. I printed a photo on both this and the sample canon glossy 4x6 paper that came with my printer. The canon paper print looked like it came from a photo lab. The kodak paper had print lines visible, the layers of ink were clearly visible, and less detail was visible. I would recommend those with canon printers to stay far away from this paper. At least I didn't spend too much on the paper.
It does not work with the Kodak Printer Dock 2006-04-02
I got this paper to use with the Kodak C310 photo dock and the paper has no borders to tear off like the ones that came with the camera so the dock will not pull the paper through and keeps saying paper error.
Inferior results 2005-08-23
This paper yields inferior results when used with an Epson C84 printer and Epson Durabrite inks. The layers of ink are clearly visible; on some prints there appears to be a "crackle" finish.
Epson paper results are consistently excellent.
