Canon EW83E Lens Hood for EF 16 35mm f/2.8L Canon SLR Lens
Normal Price:$45.00
Our Price:$25.10
Availability:Usually ships in 1-2 business days
... For more information or Buy from Amazon.com ...
Manufacturer: Canon Cameras US
Model: 7276A001
Binding: Electronics
Publisher: Canon Cameras US
Label: Canon Cameras US
Features for Canon EW83E Lens Hood for EF 16 35mm f/2.8L Canon SLR Lens:
Small Picture
Medium Picture
Customer Reviews
Another "great-to-have" accessory to go in your camera bag 
2008-08-13
I bought this for my EF-S 10-22 lens. The wide-angle lens hood is pretty flat, but large in diameter. That makes it hard to fit in to my camera bag. I can't put the lens into the bag with the lens hood on. I need to detach it and put them in separately. Often, I just get too lazy to put the lens hood back on. I don't notice much difference anyway. I wouldn't say it's a "must-have" accessory. It does block out light and protect your lens. The build quality is excellent too. Yet, I think it's a little bit expensive.
good 
2008-07-19
Attaches easily to the lens but I dont always use it because it must be removed to put into my bag.
Effective, but a strange design 2008-06-13
This hood is effective for the 17-40 on a fullframe camera, or the 10-22 on an APS-C camera. The problem with the hood is that it is physically very wide. I normally store my hoods reversed on the lens, and then I put the lens in a camera bag. The width of this hood can make that difficult. They could easily have designed a hood that is much closer to the diameter of the lens that would have eliminated this storage problem. This is a goofy hood; if you don't absolutely needs it, try to go without it.
Canon EW83E Lens Hood for EF 16-35mm f/2.8L Canon SLR Lens 
2008-02-29
The Canon EW83E is the proper hood for the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L Canon SLR Lens. It works as advertised and was shipped promptly. As with the other non-L Canon lenses, I feel that Canon should have included the hood with the lens, given the high price of the lens. The hood is essential for avoiding loss of contrast through ambient light induced flare.
Exactly the same as the original came with the lens 2008-01-18
Easy to put on and take off. Good quality. Exactly the same as the original hood came with the Canon 17-40mm F4 lens that I lost.
Canon EW83E Lens Hood 2007-12-11
Specially designed Lens Hood for the CANON 16-35 f/2.8L USM Lens & the CANON 17-40 f/4.0 L USM Lens (CAN 17-40MM/USM)
A bare necessity 2007-10-11
My 10-22mm wide is superb in cathing the full picture. The EW83E is the vital final touch - both in controlling the light and visually. It' also great protection working in busy environments.
Should've been included with lens 2007-09-09
It does what it is supposed to do; greatly reduces chance of flare and also serves as some protection to the lens. Fits well and easy to put on and take off. As usual, Canon did not include it with the lens. I imagine there are suitable knock-offs but I didn't research it as I bought the lens and hood at the same time.
Works fine, but expensive 2007-08-23
I always use a lens hood on my camera because they're cheaper to replace than a damaged lens should you bump into something. This hood works fine, but I gave it three stars for two reasons: first, it's a pretty flimsy piece of black plastic. You can buy cheaper ones but they weren't offered on Amazon at the time I bought the 10-22 mm lens. Second, the D30 camera and hood design have a flaw: you have to remove the lens hood when using the on-camera flash or it throws a shadow on your subject.
Too Expensive? I paid a fortune for the L series wide angle and yet I am not getting it's best for $40 - no way! 2007-06-16
This lens hood will drive you crazy. A constant aggravation as no neat place to put it in my Canon Back Pack, my Lowepro rolling suitcase or my huge one secure for the amazon rain forest. It is always in the way. Unless you use it. You need to. I know. Someone mentioned filters and I had a hard time after my camera store closed. No fine camera store. Ritz Camera's has a really good description of the effects of many filters and it has been a plus for me. A $12.95 filter seemed expensive with my Canon 10 D. When I dropped the camera and the filter broke instead of the lens it seemed very reasonable. I would never not have a filter on my current L series lens collection. They cost too much.
