Welcome to Education by Design's Online store. We have brought to you a selection of products like Electronics : Audiovox ACA250 Wireless Vehicle Rear Observation System along with it's reviews, pictures and related products. All sales from these pages goes towards the creation and maintenance of our educational online activities, articles and resources. We have over 40,000 online stories submitted by kids around the world.
Audiovox ACA250 Wireless Vehicle Rear Observation System
Normal Price:$81.04
Our Price:$103.78 (Sale Price!)
Availability:Usually ships in 1-2 business days
... For more information or Buy from Amazon.com ...
Manufacturer: Audiovox Electronics Corp
Model: ACA250
Binding: Electronics
Publisher: Audiovox Electronics Corp
Label: Audiovox Electronics Corp
Features for Audiovox ACA250 Wireless Vehicle Rear Observation System:
- 2.4 Ghz Wireless Transmitter Eliminates The Need To Run Wires Through A Vehicle
- Automatically Turns On When The Vehicle Is Put In Reverse
- 110Deg Wide Angle Camera Enables Better Viewing
- Automatic Night Vision For Better Viewing
- Small Camera Bracket Allow
Small Picture
Medium Picture
Customer Reviews
Cheap thin wiring wrong size for included parts 
2008-06-27
First off, let me say I never got this system to work.
The camera hookup is supposed to use the included a vampire taps to get power and ground off the reverse light without any soldering or wire cutting. Just one problem, the wiring on the camera is WAY to thin to work with the vampire tap included. Instead of piercing the shielding and making an electrical connection, it just pinches the insulation and never goes completely through. This is just poor design on Audiovox's part and shows they don't test their final products. It's a shame.
The TV and camera operate on 2.4Ghz. Never did get the camera to fire up, but the TV already picks up ALOT of flickers of static in my driveway and while driving around the neighborhood. I can imagine it would be very difficult to see what was going on with as much static as there is. 5.8Ghz would have been a much better solution.
I don't want to hack apart my truck's OEM wiring for an accessory that might not last a year so this one is definately going back.